Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [iam-dev] Re: Problem depending on two versions of a bundle

sorry, didnt have the time and most likely I wont in the next days :(
rolled back to 3.3
maybe the problem with lucene is incompatible ranges.

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Abel Muiño Vizcaino <amuino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Another bit of information... our target platform contains two versions of
> javax.wsdl (1.4.0 and 1.5.1) and also two versions of
> org.apache.commons.lang (2.3.0, 2.1.0).
>
> For some reasin, it seems to only complain about lucene...
>
> Weird!
>
> El 02/12/2008, a las 20:10, Abel Muiño Vizcaino escribió:
>
>> I found this on the newsgroups:
>>
>> http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.technology.equinox/msg01623.html
>>
>> It states that two versions of a bundle can be active at the same time (as
>> expected). This is according to the OSGi spec and is reported by the equinox
>> team.
>>
>> The problem must then be on our side or the PDE tooling... Carlos, did you
>> get the time to report the problem to the PDE guys?
>>
>> El 02/12/2008, a las 8:27, Abel Muiño Vizcaino escribió:
>>
>>> Carlos, can you forward the question to the PDE or Equinox teams? It
>>> should be possible to have a bundle installed with several different
>>> versions.
>>>
>>> BTW: The target platform script only installs the bundles required for
>>> building (i.e. it lacks the UI part). It probably makes sense to add those
>>> (although not strictly required) for manual testing (maybe having a separate
>>> target platform for that?)
>>>
>>> El 02/12/2008, a las 2:30, Carlos Sanchez escribió:
>>>
>>>> I have gone through all the setup and finally everything builds fine
>>>> in eclipse.
>>>>
>>>> Now the problems. If I try to run it as an eclipse application I get
>>>> conflicting issues with lucene. Clicking on validate the configuration
>>>> it says that org.eclipse.help.base needs lucene 1.9,2.0 and then we
>>>> require 2.1,2.2, so even checking both lucene 1.9 and 2.1 it doesnt
>>>> validate.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2008/12/1 Abel Muiño <amuino@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm on it :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> We can not release 0.x versions without a release review, so it will be
>>>>> an snapshot or milestone.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW: we already missed M1 and M2 was scheduled on Dec 1, so it seems
>>>>> like we need to update the project plan.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Carlos Sanchez
>>>>> <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if you were able to set it up already, can you publish a developer
>>>>>> build?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Abel Muiño Vizcaino
>>>>>> <amuino@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've set up a new "main" page for all the topics related to setting a
>>>>>>> development environment for IAM.
>>>>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Environment
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This includes getting the source code and configuring the target
>>>>>>> platform
>>>>>>> (currently 3.4) only.
>>>>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Getting_Sources
>>>>>>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Target_Platform
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The part about the target platform is automated, although it needs
>>>>>>> some
>>>>>>> love... for example versions of the dependencies are not specified at
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> moment. I've marked this with TODOs on the wiki.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With a target platform in place, we should be closer to get automated
>>>>>>> builds
>>>>>>> going.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Abel.
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> iam-dev mailing list
>>>>>>> iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> iam-dev mailing list
>>>>>> iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Abel Muiño - http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> iam-dev mailing list
>>>>> iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> iam-dev mailing list
>>>> iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> iam-dev mailing list
> iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev
>


Back to the top