Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[iam-dev] Re: Problem depending on two versions of a bundle

Another bit of information... our target platform contains two versions of javax.wsdl (1.4.0 and 1.5.1) and also two versions of org.apache.commons.lang (2.3.0, 2.1.0).

For some reasin, it seems to only complain about lucene...

Weird!

El 02/12/2008, a las 20:10, Abel Muiño Vizcaino escribió:

I found this on the newsgroups:
http://dev.eclipse.org/newslists/news.eclipse.technology.equinox/msg01623.html

It states that two versions of a bundle can be active at the same time (as expected). This is according to the OSGi spec and is reported by the equinox team.

The problem must then be on our side or the PDE tooling... Carlos, did you get the time to report the problem to the PDE guys?

El 02/12/2008, a las 8:27, Abel Muiño Vizcaino escribió:

Carlos, can you forward the question to the PDE or Equinox teams? It should be possible to have a bundle installed with several different versions.

BTW: The target platform script only installs the bundles required for building (i.e. it lacks the UI part). It probably makes sense to add those (although not strictly required) for manual testing (maybe having a separate target platform for that?)

El 02/12/2008, a las 2:30, Carlos Sanchez escribió:

I have gone through all the setup and finally everything builds fine
in eclipse.

Now the problems. If I try to run it as an eclipse application I get
conflicting issues with lucene. Clicking on validate the configuration
it says that org.eclipse.help.base needs lucene 1.9,2.0 and then we
require 2.1,2.2, so even checking both lucene 1.9 and 2.1 it doesnt
validate.


2008/12/1 Abel Muiño <amuino@xxxxxxxxx>

I'm on it :-)

We can not release 0.x versions without a release review, so it will be an snapshot or milestone.

BTW: we already missed M1 and M2 was scheduled on Dec 1, so it seems like we need to update the project plan.

On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:27 AM, Carlos Sanchez <carlos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > wrote:

if you were able to set it up already, can you publish a developer build?

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 3:27 AM, Abel Muiño Vizcaino <amuino@xxxxxxxxx > wrote:
I've set up a new "main" page for all the topics related to setting a
development environment for IAM.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Environment

This includes getting the source code and configuring the target platform
(currently 3.4) only.
http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Getting_Sources
http://wiki.eclipse.org/IAM_Target_Platform

The part about the target platform is automated, although it needs some love... for example versions of the dependencies are not specified at the
moment. I've marked this with TODOs on the wiki.

With a target platform in place, we should be closer to get automated builds
going.
--
Abel.
_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev

_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev



--
Abel Muiño - http://ramblingabout.wordpress.com/

_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev

_______________________________________________
iam-dev mailing list
iam-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iam-dev





Back to the top