Re: [higgins-dev] Requirements for Deployments

["Ben Laurie" <benl@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/12/07, Jim Sermersheim <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> yeah, it would be good if a developer could get, install, configure, run and maybe not have to re-do all that in a different way in order to start doing 'development' stuff

Its fairly acceptable for the development and deployment setups to
look different. Its good if you can have them both installed without
shooting yourself in the foot, though.

I think your audience summary is fairly spot on (there will also be
packagers, but I think you can count them as developers).

>
> >>> Johnny Bufu <johnny@xxxxxxxx> 10/12/07 12:30 PM >>>
>
> On 12-Oct-07, at 10:46 AM, Jim Sermersheim wrote:
>
> > Before making much noise about our deployments pages, we ought to
> > make them usable.  I think there are two target audiences for many
> > of the deployments.  Here's a stab at describing them:
>
> +1
>
> Great summary; it would be really useful to have the Higgins
> deployments packaged and documented in such a way.
>
> The only comment I would add: as a developer I also fit into the
> 'deployers' category: before diving into tweaking new / unfamiliar
> code, I really want to see it running on my machine first.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Johnny
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev
>