Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [higgins-dev] Proposed updates to Higgins ArchitecturediagramperAustin F2F discussions

Why do we need to develop a non-IdAS-based CPIP?

It was only my supposition. We already have XML-based CMIP (perhaps for testing purposes only), which stores cards within encrypted xml data file. If we need similar CPIP we shouldn't oblige ICard provider to use IdAS to store claim values of ICard.

Thanks,
Sergey  Lyakhov
----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Sergey Lyakhov'" <slyakhov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'" <higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 3:48 PM
Subject: RE: [higgins-dev] Proposed updates to Higgins ArchitecturediagramperAustin F2F discussions



SergeyL wrote:

> But thinking out loud here...if I were designing the CPIP I think I
would
> have stored within the CPIP object itself a URI field: "<ContextId> /
> <SubjectId>", where ContextId points to, say, a Jena-backed Context. > And
> SubjectId to a DS within it (the SubjectId can be null if there is only
> one
> DS in the Context, BTW).

Yes, IdAS-based CPIP is implemented in this way. Personal I-Card contains
a
reference (ContextId + SubjectId) to a Digital Subject which contains a
list
of claims ().

Good.

On the other hand, STS shouldn't use this reference, if we
will need to develop some non-IdAS based CPIP.

Why do we need to develop a non-IdAS-based CPIP?

There is a method
ICard.getClaims(), and it could be used by STS in case of Personal ICard.

Thanks,
Sergey Lyakhov
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Trevithick" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Higgins (Trust Framework) Project developer discussions'"
<higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <higgins-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 2:45 AM
Subject: RE: [higgins-dev] Proposed updates to Higgins Architecture
diagramperAustin F2F discussions


>
>
> Mike wrote
>>
>> Paul,
>>
>> We are trying to figure out a few things wrt attributes for "personal"
>> i-Cards.
>> In "managed" mode, the STS pulls attribute values for claims from a
>> Context via Context Provider/IdAS.
>> In "personal" mode, it is unclear where the attibute (and master key)
>> values are - are they in the i-Card Store?
>
> SergeyL has been designing and developing the CardSpace Personal i-card
> provider (CPIP). So he should answer rather than I. The doc he wrote
here
> [1] is extremely vague (and should be fixed).
>
> But thinking out loud here...if I were designing the CPIP I think I
would
> have stored within the CPIP object itself a URI field: "<ContextId> /
> <SubjectId>", where ContextId points to, say, a Jena-backed Context. > And
> SubjectId to a DS within it (the SubjectId can be null if there is only
> one
> DS in the Context, BTW). That way I could pass this ContextId/SubjectId
> reference along in the RST to the TS and the TS could open this
> ContextId/SubjectId. I would have separately developed a parser to
import
> the MSFT-defined personal i-card format. And I'd have separately
developed
> a
> generator to export to this same format.
>
>> It seems as if there is a need for the iCard Store for personal >> i-Cards
>> to
>> be accessible via Context Provider/IdAS.
>> If so the lines aren't drawn to reflect that.
>
> As mentioned I'm assuming that the runtime storage of CPIP attributes > is
> in
> IdAS. So only the existing blue link from the CPIP i-card provider to
the
> IdAS Component is required.
>
> [1] > http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/CardSpace_Personal_I-Card_Provider
>
> <snip>
>
> _______________________________________________
> higgins-dev mailing list
> higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev

_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev




Back to the top