[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Fwd: Re: Re[2]: [higgins-dev] IdAS Update Proposals
|
Not yet.
Tom
>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/27/2007 2:42 PM >>>
inline
>>> "Tom Doman" <TDoman@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/27/07 2:37 PM >>>
>The only one I don't like is proposal 2. The way objects
>are extended is confusing and yields calls that make
>no sense for some cases. Lists of lists are also possible.
>Of the rest, my preference would be 3, 1, then 4 though
>I'd be content with any of those.
>I wouldn't mind the approach of 3 extending to anything
>that applies to only one kind of value, say, even simple and
>complex, if API differences make sense there.
Do you have an example in mind?
>That may not be the case but I like the notion of
>getting useful, specific functionality based on
>increasing knowledge of the nature of the object.
Tom
<snip>
_______________________________________________
higgins-dev mailing list
higgins-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/higgins-dev