| Re: [higgins-dev] IdAS Update Proposals |
|
I updated both the diff and javadoc with javadoc fixes >>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/24/07 4:15 PM >>> oops, here's the diff >>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/24/07 4:09 PM >>> I've attached a diff of the update changes and put the javadoc here http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/org.eclipse.higgins.docs/idas/
Note that this is still missing the other set of changes that we're talking about at this page http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/IdAS_Update_Proposals_2. I plan to address those as a followup to the first wave of changes.
Please review and let me know if there are issues. Otherwise, I hope to check these changes in either tomorrow or Thursday.
I will fix the various Javadoc errors and begin implementing the new Basic* methods in the interim.
Jim
>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/24/07 2:23 PM >>> Some pseudocode for use cases can be found at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/IdAS_Update_Proposals#Use_Cases >>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/24/07 10:59 AM >>> I've updated http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/IdAS_Update_Proposals_Distillation with what I believe to be general consensus thus far.
I'll move on to some use-case pseudo-code.
|
Attachment:
IdASUpdateRefactor-2.diff
Description: Binary data