[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [higgins-dev] IdAS Update Proposals

I updated both the diff and javadoc with javadoc fixes

>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/24/07 4:15 PM >>>
oops, here's the diff

>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/24/07 4:09 PM >>>
I've attached a diff of the update changes and put the javadoc here http://www.eclipse.org/higgins/org.eclipse.higgins.docs/idas/
 
Note that this is still missing the other set of changes that we're talking about at this page http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/IdAS_Update_Proposals_2.  I plan to address those as a followup to the first wave of changes.
 
Please review and let me know if there are issues.  Otherwise, I hope to check these changes in either tomorrow or Thursday.
 
I will fix the various Javadoc errors and begin implementing the new Basic* methods in the interim.
 
Jim
 


>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/24/07 2:23 PM >>>
Some pseudocode for use cases can be found at http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/IdAS_Update_Proposals#Use_Cases

>>> "Jim Sermersheim" <jimse@xxxxxxxxxx> 4/24/07 10:59 AM >>>
I've updated http://wiki.eclipse.org/index.php/IdAS_Update_Proposals_Distillation with what I believe to be general consensus thus far.
 
I'll move on to some use-case pseudo-code.

Attachment: IdASUpdateRefactor-2.diff
Description: Binary data