[equinox-dev] Equinox relaunch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[equinox-dev] Equinox relaunch

From: "Todorova, Katya" <katya.todorova@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:13:02 +0200
Accept-language: en-US, de-DE
Acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Delivered-to: equinox-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/equinox-dev>
List-help: <mailto:equinox-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev>, <mailto:equinox-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/equinox-dev>, <mailto:equinox-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Thread-index: AcxuPIe8kh12fZEvQNy1lOY8fLV/uQMfe0rA
Thread-topic: Equinox relaunch

Hi guys, 

What's the expected behavior of calling consecutively framework shutdown -> init -> launch?
I tried doing it command line and the equinox's final state is "starting" (sl is 0). Shouldn't it be "active" (at sl 1) according to the spec?

Thanks,
Katya

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox relaunch
  - From: Thomas Watson

References:
- [equinox-dev] Difference in system.packages.extra behaviour between 3.6.2 and 3.7
  - From: Ben Cox
- Re: [equinox-dev] Difference in system.packages.extra behaviour between 3.6.2 and 3.7
  - From: Neil Bartlett
- Re: [equinox-dev] Difference in system.packages.extra behaviour between 3.6.2 and 3.7
  - From: Alex Blewitt
- Re: [equinox-dev] Difference in system.packages.extra behaviour between 3.6.2 and 3.7
  - From: Ben Cox
- Re: [equinox-dev] Difference in system.packages.extra behaviour between 3.6.2 and 3.7
  - From: Neil Bartlett

Prev by Date: Re: [equinox-dev] same bundle in multiple regions
Next by Date: Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox relaunch
Previous by thread: Re: [equinox-dev] Difference in system.packages.extra behaviour between 3.6.2 and 3.7
Next by thread: Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox relaunch
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs