Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP

From: Gunnar Wagenknecht <gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 17:02:59 +0100
Delivered-to: epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/epp-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:epp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev>, <mailto:epp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/epp-dev>, <mailto:epp-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> On Feb 5, 2021, at 16:49, Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Sorry for the confusion - does saying eclipse.org/download vs download.eclipse.org clarify things?

Not really. They are the same to me. One is the website. Other delivers the binaries. :) 

> I agree - this is in part what my email is about. If all features must come through simrel, should EPP continue to host builds of Rust IDE or not? 

It should stop. Unless there is a contributor coming up helping the Rust project participating in the simultaneous release. 

-Gunnar

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
  - From: Mickael Istria

References:
- [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
  - From: Jonah Graham
- Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
  - From: Gunnar Wagenknecht
- Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
  - From: Jonah Graham
- Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
  - From: Gunnar Wagenknecht
- Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
  - From: Jonah Graham

Prev by Date: Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
Next by Date: Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
Previous by thread: Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
Next by thread: Re: [epp-dev] Future of Rust/Corrosion in EPP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs