> On Feb 5, 2021, at 16:32, Jonah Graham <jonah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Rust/Corrosion are Eclipse projects (no plans for that to stop as far as I know). The issue is that Corrosion is not part of SimRel.
Now I'm confused. You wrote "non-eclipse.org/...". Why would an Eclipse project providing a p2 repository not use eclipse.org/download?
Also, I'm not sure why this is an EPP question then. If it's an Eclipse project *and* there are volunteers/contributors with interest in having this in EPP why would they not take care of helping the project producing a p2 repo and participating in SimRel?
It is a question because EPP currently builds a Rust IDE that is currently part of
eclipse.org/download listed IDEs but will not be anymore.
FWIW, EMOs statement still applies.
* All features to the package must come through the simultaneous release *
https://www.eclipse.org/lists/cross-project-issues-dev/msg18148.html
I think we should play by the rules. EPP was not created to be a vehicle of doing work that should happen in the projects.
I agree - this is in part what my email is about. If all features must come through simrel, should EPP continue to host builds of Rust IDE or not?
Jonah
-Gunnar
--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/
_______________________________________________
epp-dev mailing list
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
