My comments embedded below,
Ben
From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Per Kroll
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 5:26 AM
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [epf-dev] General: Questions on Introduction to OpenUP node
intreebrowser
Hi,
I have a few
questions regarding the node "Introduction to OpenUP"
- Should we
merge "Introduction to OpenUP" and "OpenUP in a Nutshell"?
<I think yes>
[BW] I vote yes
- Will the
overview graph be at "Introduction to OpenUP"? <I think yes, but
this is becoming a length page, is that wise for an intro page?>
[BW] As per Ricardos comments, yes I think it needs to be, and
should be displayed at the top of the page
- Do we still
need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts"? I have already referenced the 4
phases, risk, and iteration from Governance lifecycle and Iteration lifecycle
respectively. I also referenced Software Architecture from Micro iteration, and
I could reference Use Case, from Micro Increment, but I do not think there is a
great logical connection <I think no, we do not need "OpenUP
Fundamental Concepts". >
[BW] What is the rationale for getting rid of this?
Cheers
Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
(M) 408-219-2963