[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [epf-dev] General: Questions on Introduction to OpenUP node intreebrowser
|
Ben,
- Do we still need "OpenUP Fundamental
Concepts"? I have already referenced the 4 phases, risk, and iteration
from Governance lifecycle and Iteration lifecycle respectively. I also
referenced Software Architecture from Micro iteration, and I could reference
Use Case, from Micro Increment, but I do not think there is a great logical
connection <I think no, we do not need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts".
>
[BW] What is the
rationale for getting rid of this?
I think the rationale is that we want
as simple structure as possible, and most of this material is already referenced
from the 3 layers, so can we manager with one node less?
Cheers
Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
(M) 408-219-2963
"Ben Williams"
<Ben.Williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
07/04/2007 03:23 PM
|
Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "Eclipse Process Framework Project
Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [epf-dev] General: Questions on
Introduction to OpenUP node intreebrowser |
|
My comments embedded below,
Ben
From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Per Kroll
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 5:26 AM
To: epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [epf-dev] General: Questions on Introduction to OpenUP node
intreebrowser
Hi,
I have a few questions regarding the node "Introduction to OpenUP"
- Should we merge "Introduction to OpenUP" and "OpenUP in
a Nutshell"? <I think yes>
[BW] I vote yes
- Will the overview graph be at "Introduction to OpenUP"? <I
think yes, but this is becoming a length page, is that wise for an intro
page?>
[BW] As per Ricardos
comments, yes I think it needs to be, and should be displayed at the top
of the page
- Do we still need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts"? I have already
referenced the 4 phases, risk, and iteration from Governance lifecycle
and Iteration lifecycle respectively. I also referenced Software Architecture
from Micro iteration, and I could reference Use Case, from Micro Increment,
but I do not think there is a great logical connection <I think no,
we do not need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts". >
[BW] What is the
rationale for getting rid of this?
Cheers
Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
(M) 408-219-2963
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Telelogic Lifecycle Solutions:
Helping You Define, Design & Deliver Advanced Systems & Software
Learn More at www.telelogic.com
Ben Williams
Director of Product Management, Lifecycle Solutions
Telelogic UK Ltd
Northbrook House, Oxford Science Park,
Oxford
OX4 4GA, United Kingdom
Phone: +44 020 7193 7067
Fax: +44 (1865) 784 286
Mobile phone: +44 (7710) 637 067
Ben.Williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.telelogic.com
Telelogic - Requirements-Driven Innovation!
-------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained
in this e-mail, including any attachment or enclosure, is intended only
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
material. Any unauthorized use, review, retransmissions, dissemination,
copying or other use of this information by persons or entities other than
the intended recipient is prohibited.
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev
