Re: [epf-dev] General: Questions on Introduction to OpenUP node in treeb

[Ricardo Balduino <balduino@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think the overview graph needs to
be on the front page, no matter what we call that page. It is fine if you
scroll down once for reaching the bottom of the page, but still the graph
should be visible when the page is initially displayed.
I don't have any concerns with removing
the Fundamental Concepts node from the tree if those concepts are referenced
the way you propose.

Cheers,

Ricardo Balduino
IBM Rational Software (www.ibm.com/rational)
Eclipse Process Framework (www.eclipse.org/epf)

Per Kroll/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

07/02/2007 09:25 PM

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject	[epf-dev] General: Questions on Introduction to OpenUP node in        treebrowser

Hi, 

I have a few questions regarding the node "Introduction to OpenUP"
- Should we merge "Introduction to OpenUP" and "OpenUP in
a Nutshell"? <I think yes> 
- Will the overview graph be at "Introduction to OpenUP"? <I
think yes, but this is becoming a length page, is that wise for an intro
page?> 
- Do we still need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts"? I have already
referenced the 4 phases, risk, and iteration from Governance lifecycle
and Iteration lifecycle respectively. I also referenced Software Architecture
from Micro iteration, and I could reference Use Case, from Micro Increment,
but I do not think there is a great logical connection <I think no,
we do not need "OpenUP Fundamental Concepts". >

Cheers 

Per Kroll
STSM, Manager Methods: RUP / RMC
Project Lead: Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software, IBM Corp
(M) 408-219-2963_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev