RE: [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics

[Peter Haumer <phaumer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks a lot Greg. This is very interesting.


Nate, you need an OMG member id as this
is only an initial submission. I will send you the file directly.


Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.

______________________________________________________________

PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
Rational Method Composer | Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
Tel.: +1 (408) 463-5096
______________________________________________________________

"Nate Oster" <noster@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/26/2007 19:09

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	RE: [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics

Dr. Sullivan,
 
There seems to be password
protection on the link. 
 
Thanks,
Nate Oster

---

From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sullivan, Gregory
(US SSA)
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 10:06 PM
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
Subject: RE: [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics
 
You might look at the Software
Metrics Meta-Model (SMM) from the Architecture Driven Modernization (ADM)
task force of the OMG:
http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/Software_Metrics_Metamodel_RFP.html
 
All documents available from adm.omg.org
 
--Greg
--
Gregory T. Sullivan, Ph.D.
BAE Systems Advanced Information Technologies
6 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803
(781)262-4553
gregory.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

---

From: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Haumer
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:33 PM
To: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
Cc: Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List; epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Software Development Metrics
 

No, it was just not in scope, yet.  Any suggestions are very welcome.

In SPEM 2.0 we modeled Metrics as Describable Elements (i.e. documentation)
that also own a list of formal UML Infrastructure Value Specifications,
which is what we currently planning of implementing. 


Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.

______________________________________________________________

PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
Rational Method Composer | Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
Tel.: +1 (408) 463-5096
______________________________________________________________

"Pamio, Diego" <diego.pamio@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

04/24/2007 19:09

Please respond to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List        <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List" <epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[epf-dev] Software Development Metrics

 

Did anyone tried to model process & product metrics method elements
with EPF? How is the best way to do it? I know this seems just not to be
an [epf-“DEV”] question, but mi concern is that the “metrics” world
has been considered or just that when designing the epf-composer, a better
solution to handle the metrics problematic was found, like, for instance,
a combination of tasks, guidelines, terms definitions, roles and workproducts
(that is, roles for metrics collection and reporting responsibles, guidelines
for metrics computation, terms definitions for formulae, workproducts for
source data and tasks to glue everything).
  
Which are your experiences on the topic?
  
Regards, 
Diego N. Pamio 
asdc 
Argentina Software 
Development Center 
Intel Software de Arg. 
++54 351 414 5571 
 _______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev