Dr. Sullivan,
There seems to be password protection on
the link.
Thanks,
Nate Oster
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sullivan, Gregory (US SSA)
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007
10:06 PM
To: Eclipse
Process Framework Project Developers List
Subject: RE: [epf-dev] Software
Development Metrics
You might look at the Software Metrics
Meta-Model (SMM) from the Architecture Driven Modernization (ADM) task force of
the OMG:
http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/Software_Metrics_Metamodel_RFP.html
All documents available from adm.omg.org
--Greg
--
Gregory T. Sullivan, Ph.D.
BAE Systems Advanced Information Technologies
6 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA 01803
(781)262-4553
gregory.sullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From:
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter Haumer
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007
9:33 PM
To: Eclipse
Process Framework Project Developers List
Cc: Eclipse
Process Framework Project Developers List;
epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [epf-dev] Software
Development Metrics
No, it was just not in scope, yet. Any suggestions are very
welcome.
In
SPEM 2.0 we modeled Metrics as Describable Elements (i.e. documentation) that
also own a list of formal UML Infrastructure Value Specifications, which is
what we currently planning of implementing.
Thanks and best regards,
Peter Haumer.
______________________________________________________________
PETER HAUMER, Dr. rer. nat.
Rational Method Composer | Eclipse Process Framework
Rational Software | IBM Software Group
Tel.: +1 (408) 463-5096
______________________________________________________________
"Pamio, Diego"
<diego.pamio@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent
by: epf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/24/2007
19:09
Please respond
to
Eclipse Process Framework Project Developers List
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
"Eclipse Process
Framework Project Developers List"
<epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[epf-dev] Software Development Metrics
|
|
Did anyone tried to model process & product metrics
method elements with EPF? How is the best way to do it? I know this seems just
not to be an [epf-“DEV”] question, but mi concern is that the
“metrics” world has been considered or just that when designing the
epf-composer, a better solution to handle the metrics problematic was found,
like, for instance, a combination of tasks, guidelines, terms definitions,
roles and workproducts (that is, roles for metrics collection and reporting
responsibles, guidelines for metrics computation, terms definitions for
formulae, workproducts for source data and tasks to glue everything).
Which are your experiences on the topic?
Regards,
Diego N.
Pamio
asdc
Argentina Software
Development Center
Intel
Software de Arg.
++54
351 414 5571
_______________________________________________
epf-dev mailing list
epf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epf-dev