Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [egit-dev] retention policy for builds

It might be worth noting that using composites is not all benefits. Here are a couple of things that might be worth considering:

1. Adding a p2.index file to the same directory as the compositeContent.jar (or .xml) will minimize the number of accesses that p2 will need in order to identify the type of repository. p2 always looks for this file first. If it isn't found, it will look for content.jar, content.xml, compositeContent.jar, compositeContent.xml (in that order). For people sitting across the big pool, each 404 in that process costs at least half a second.

2. The performance when downloading meta-data is degraded each time a new repository is added to the composite. The degradation is more or less linear. This can be perceived negatively by your users so if you have a large number of children, it might be better to merge them into one single plain repository.

3. An alternative to the composite approach might be to say that the main (most commonly used) repository is the child that contains the latest stuff and inform the user that a more complete repository (containing all history) can be found using another URL. My guess is that 99% of your users will be happy with your latest release.

HTH,
- Thomas Hallgren

On 2011-06-15 15:15, Matthias Sohn wrote:
2011/6/14 Steffen Pingel <steffen.pingel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
What happens when 1.0.1 is released, will the updates-1.0 site still
have the 1.0.0 release?

For Mylyn we use composites for that purpose that aggregate releases
from an archive that retains all released versions forever (older
versions move to archive.eclipse.org eventually). The maintenance site
for the each stream serves all released versions of a stream. That
allows integrator to use strict version constraints while still
providing the convenience of a site that serves the latest release.

The other nice property of composites sites is that you can move
things to the archive without affecting integrators.

This is a good idea, I started using a composite repository for staging and 
it works well. So I can try to set this up.

How do you maintain the composite definition files ? Any pointers how
this is done in Mylyn ?

--
Matthias
_______________________________________________ egit-dev mailing list egit-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/egit-dev


Back to the top