Re: [egit-dev] JGit projection creatoin?

["Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Mik Kersten <mik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Or you could consider the approach we've taken several times, mostly modeled
> on Platform, to make the dependencies explicit in the bundle names:
> * org.eclipse.egit.core (JGit stuff, runs happily on a Java classpath)
> * org.eclipse.egit.resources (core stuff coupled to workspace/resources,
> current stuff in core)
> * org.eclipse.egit.ui (coupled to workbench/UI)

OK, I'm going to propose that we name them as above.  It means
renaming our current core bundle/package, but the UI bundle/package
can stay where it is.

org.eclipse.egit.jgit just bothers me, too many gits in the kitchen.
And like you, I don't like deep package namespaces.

-- 
Shawn.