[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Mars+1 Naming Issues
|
Sigh. I¹m not sure how O would be better than N. I¹m back to thinking we
should just do numbers.
Doug.
On 2015-03-04, 10:52 AM, "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>On 04/03/2015 10:47 AM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>> I really must be biased. The clear winner is ³I don¹t like any of
>> these names². Nano and Naboo were the only ones to have more votes
>> that weren¹t that than the write-in votes for Nimoy.
>
>Ya, FWIW I'm not happy with any of the remaining names, especially now
>that Nano and Nimoy have failed.
>
>Maybe we just skip "N" and try "O"?
>
>_______________________________________________
>eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
>eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>
>IMPORTANT: Membership in this list is generated by processes internal to
>the Eclipse Foundation. To be permanently removed from this list, you
>must contact emo@xxxxxxxxxxx to request removal.
