[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [eclipse.org-architecture-council] Bylaws Change on AC (was: 10-Mar AC meeting notes)
- From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:16:19 -0600
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CBg8pQnhW/tEJm1MtKLvv9wcnAhQtkBP/85QHZDZDHMyZguTnhONcdgp2vpjs3i7P4 oI03FcJXbAMS5ZBwvtx7YRiCfDgxntbzdt4eeGiFAZEluHi87fsav5He18YfUh6RHktD OQPz2nH0zrcb6EgZwT9r0jlOighNXy/XboiPQ=
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:25 AM, John Arthorne <John_Arthorne@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I agree with Gunnar. I think
"influence software architectures used by Projects" is good.
Influence doesn't imply control, or dictating the direction.
+1, we've always had a mantra at Eclipse that projects really get to do what they want as long as the EDP is followed.Â
+1 860 839 2465