Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [e4-dev] Now's the time to figure out what we need in e4
I think a MWizard is an excellent idea but do we need MWizardPages? Having wizard pages is specific to an implementation of a wizard. 

Cheers,

Wim


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The concept is universal and has nothing to do with SWT / JFace.

MDialog extends MPart {

}

MWizard extends MElementContainer<MWizardPage> {

}

MWizardPage {

}

MPart extends MWizardPage, .... {

}

Hack you could even see a wizard to be a specialication of
MPartStackContainer!

Tom

On 09.10.13 14:40, Marc Teufel wrote:
> Are you sure that this is really more consistent ? Dont forget: Wizards
> for instance are a JFace-specific kind of thing and i always thought the
> application model itself should be independent of SWT, JFace. Or do you
> think of a more abstract way of integration and if yes how this could
> look like?
>
>
> 2013/10/9 Lars Vogel <lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxx>>
>
>     Having dialogs and wizards in the model would definitely be more
>     consistent IMHO.
>
>     Am 09.10.2013 11:50 schrieb "Tom Schindl"
>     <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>:
>
>         On 07.10.13 16:50, Markus A. Kuppe wrote:
>         > On 10/07/2013 04:37 PM, Lars Vogel wrote:
>         >> I personally think the lack of Pojo programming support for
>         the Eclipse IDE
>         >> is preventing a larger ecosystem to provide Eclipse 4
>         extensions. So your
>         >> work started for POJO views in
>         >> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=356511 was
>         really great.
>         >> Having the same of handlers would help. Maybe it could be
>         used to build a
>         >> perspective switcher which works in the IDE and the RCP
>         applications.
>         >
>         > Hi,
>         >
>         > the same goes for PreferencePages. Ideally, the preference
>         page extesion
>         > point ("org.eclipse.ui.preferencePages") would accept POJOs
>         and not just
>         > instances implementing
>          org.eclipse.ui.IWorkbenchPreferencePage (similar
>         > to bug #356511).
>
>         Before doing this I'd like us to discuss in more general if Dialog &
>         Wizards should not get part of the model!
>
>         Tom
>         _______________________________________________
>         e4-dev mailing list
>         e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>         https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     e4-dev mailing list
>     e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mail: teufel.marc@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:teufel.marc@xxxxxxxxx>
> Web: http://www.teufel.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> e4-dev mailing list
> e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev
>

_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev

Back to the top