Re: [e4-dev] Now's the time to figure out what we need in e4

[Marc Teufel <teufel.marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Are you sure that this is really more consistent ? Dont forget: Wizards for instance are a JFace-specific kind of thing and i always thought the application model itself should be independent of SWT, JFace. Or do you think of a more abstract way of integration and if yes how this could look like?

2013/10/9 Lars Vogel <lars.vogel@xxxxxxxxx>

Having dialogs and wizards in the model would definitely be more consistent IMHO.

Am 09.10.2013 11:50 schrieb "Tom Schindl" <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On 07.10.13 16:50, Markus A. Kuppe wrote:
> On 10/07/2013 04:37 PM, Lars Vogel wrote:
>> I personally think the lack of Pojo programming support for the Eclipse IDE
>> is preventing a larger ecosystem to provide Eclipse 4 extensions. So your
>> work started for POJO views in
>> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=356511 was really great.
>> Having the same of handlers would help. Maybe it could be used to build a
>> perspective switcher which works in the IDE and the RCP applications.
>
> Hi,
>
> the same goes for PreferencePages. Ideally, the preference page extesion
> point ("org.eclipse.ui.preferencePages") would accept POJOs and not just
> instances implementing  org.eclipse.ui.IWorkbenchPreferencePage (similar
> to bug #356511).

Before doing this I'd like us to discuss in more general if Dialog &
Wizards should not get part of the model!

Tom
_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev

_______________________________________________
e4-dev mailing list
e4-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/e4-dev

--
Mail: teufel.marc@xxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.teufel.net