[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [dsdp-mtj-dev] Discussion about mtj extension points
|
Paulo,
Looking at
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Analysis_of_Extension_Points_and_Plugins_Model
it looks like you have them all covered with the exception of anything
related to device fragmentation (preprocessing, etc). I think that is
correct in the short term, but I'd like to make sure that we don't lose
those tasks for later releases.
There are a couple of services, I'm not sure about:
* Build provider
Given that Eclipse is built on the concept of builders, do we need
another builder? Given that builders and project natures are pretty
closely related, I can see where we *might*, but I can only see it as a
switch to determine what builder gets called (essentially a delegating
builder). I'd hate to see us reinvent too much of the current Eclipse
build infrastructure.
* libraries
I guess I'm not sure if we need this to be separate from a device
definition?
Thanks,
Craig
Paula Gustavo-WGP010 wrote:
Hi,
I added today an initial analysis that i made of the current
extensions points that are available on MTJ. I just tried to identify
all of them and understand what were their functionality on MTJ context.
I posted it on the mtj wiki together with a section that can be used
in 2008 planning.
Please feel free to comment on it. We can try to start our discussion
about the MTJ services on top of it.
Thanks,
:)
gustavo
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dsdp-mtj-dev mailing list
dsdp-mtj-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dsdp-mtj-dev
