RE: [cosmos-dev] i9 QA Execution - Status update #1 (Build :COSMOS-1.0.0

[Hubert H Leung <hkyleung@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I think we need to define what ownership of a component exactly mean and
how to use the components.  And we need guidelines for defining new
components.  As we add new features to the project, we cannot have a new
component created for every new feature we implement.  The federating CMDB
test harness (we don't have a federating CMDB) can be in the "Data Manager
Examples" component.

I don't think we need to use components as a way to route bugs to the right
person.  When you open a bug and you know who developed that feature,
assign the bug directly to the person.  Otherwise, the bug will be assigned
to the component lead, who will need to reassign it to the right person.
Having a few components for each sub-project may help, but if the
components are too fine-grained, it will be difficult to decide which
component a bug or an issue belongs.  Also, if we assign many components to
the same person, it defeats the purpose.  So don't go overboard with
creating lots of components.

>From my experience from TPTP, the list of components is hard to maintain.
There is a lot of management overhead.  We should keep the number of
components to a minimum.

For your reference, here is how TPTP sub-divide sub-projects into
components:
http://www.eclipse.org/tptp/home/project_info/structure/TPTP_Project_Info.html.
  They have more than 70 components.  Don't even get close to this number.


Regards,
_________________________
Hubert Leung
IBM Toronto Lab
hkyleung@xxxxxxxxxx
905-413-3382


                                                                           
             Sheldon                                                       
             Lee-Loy/Toronto/I                                             
             BM@IBMCA                                                   To 
             Sent by:                  Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
             cosmos-dev-bounce                                          cc 
             s@xxxxxxxxxxx                                                 
                                                                   Subject 
                                       RE: [cosmos-dev] i9 QA Execution -  
             02/28/2008 12:00          Status   update      #1    (Build   
             PM                        :COSMOS-1.0.0-200802261616)         
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
                Cosmos Dev                                                 
             <cosmos-dev@eclip                                             
                  se.org>                                                  
                                                                           
                                                                           




Who owns the Federating CMDBf?  This is probably another reason why we
should have  a component owner list :)....  Ali do you know the answer?

We probably should add a test case in the e2e test suite  to submit a cmdb
query to the example federating CMDB.

Thanks,

Sheldon
______________________________________
Sheldon Lee-Loy




             David Whiteman
             <David_Whiteman@u
             s.ibm.com>                                                 To
             Sent by:                  Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
             cosmos-dev-bounce                                          cc
             s@xxxxxxxxxxx
                                                                   Subject
                                       RE: [cosmos-dev] i9 QA Execution -
             02/28/2008 11:41          Status update  #1    (Build
             AM                        :COSMOS-1.0.0-200802261616)


             Please respond to
                Cosmos Dev
             <cosmos-dev@eclip
                  se.org>







Sheldon wrote on 02/28/2008 11:22:35 AM:

> 'Submit Query' is a default action on a data manager.  It should always
be
> present to allow the user to submit some form of query that the data
> manager is aware of.    Ali or David do you know if the Example
Federating
> CMDB is able to recieve CMDBf queries?  If so are there test cases for
this
> feature?

I didn't develop that example, but it should be able to, as all MDRs that
have a registration service must also implement a query service.  In the
org.eclipse.cosmos.example.mdr.registration.tests project, I see some query
tests specifically in the
org.eclipse.cosmos.example.mdr.registration.internal.query package.

David_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev


_______________________________________________
cosmos-dev mailing list
cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev