Re: [cdt-dev] Fw: CDT 2.1.1 Build I200502031120 completed

[Dave Inglis <dinglis@xxxxxxx>]

Douglas Schaefer wrote:
> Actually I would call 2.1.1 a maintenance release. I remember a discussion 
> that we had at one of the calls where I expressed the wish that we could 
> take a build at any time on the maintenance branch and call it a 
> maintenance release. We would bless it with a number when we felt good 
> enough to promote it as an official release.
>
> So for these x.x.x releases, I think it is sufficient to produce a build 
> when someone requests it. If the build turns out to be pretty good, we can 
> vote to bless it with a number.
>
> The issue that comes to mind is the CVS tag. I need to make sure I tag 
> these builds so I can go back and give it the release tag when we vote for 
> it. I'll do this for the next 2.1.1 build (unless there have been no 
> changes since then in which case I can tag it now).

I checked in a fix just after yours so I think we'll need a least one 
more build.

Thanks