[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cdt-dev] EclipseCon presentations
|
Hi,
On the BOFs matter, I prefer the first option (2 BOFs). All in one would
be probably too many subjects to allow any discussion to really start
(assuming a BOF is supposed to last 1 hour).
We (MontaVista) apply for a talk on Remote System Framework, that I
propose to cancel and join to TI in the second BOFs, if it is ok with TI
folks and others.
Thoughts? comments?
Pierre-Alexandre
Sebastien Marineau wrote:
Hi folks,
This is a follow-up to the discussions we had on the conf. call with
respect to presentation slots (and BOFs) on CDT at EclipseCon. I’ve
spoken with the conference organizers, and expressed our eagerness to
do multiple sessions on CDT. Unfortunately, I don’t think there are
enough speaking slots to accommodate all talks (frankly, they were
surprised we wanted to do more than 1 J). What they have suggested is
that CDT could present 2 or 3 talks (2 for sure, maybe 3), along with
one BOF. Based on that, I’d like to come up with a proposal that
allows everyone to participate.
Here’s a couple of suggestions of how we could proceed:
Talks:
1. CDT state of the world – where we are at, what’s ahead, etc (QNX)
2. Providing a development environment for Linux – CDT, oprofile,
RPM plugins (we could try to pass this as a non-CDT talk) (Redhat)
3. Design and implementation of a high-performance C/C++ code
parser under eclipse – challenges, lessons learned, etc (IBM)
4. Timesys had various ideas on presentations. Maybe there is some
angle we can take that is non-CDT specific?
BOF:
The topics that have been suggested for discussions are as follows:
1. General CDT BOF (general discussions, similar to last year)
2. Intel managed build discussion
3. TI: deeply embedded development and debugging with Eclipse and CDT
I see a couple of options. The first is for us to do #1 and #2 in a
CDT BOF (quite reasonable, the topics fit well together), and try to
get a second BOF for embedded debugging which TI would drive (#3).
This could turn into a more general BOF, either on CDT debugging, or
on Eclipse for deeply embedded apps. Maybe we could get others to
participate (Altera, Tensilica, Intel?).
The second option is to include all three topics into a single CDT BOF.
In any case, I’m looking for people’s opinions on this. I promised the
EclipseCon organizers I’d get them a proposal, along with rough
abstracts before the end of the week. I’ll obviously need some help
with the abstracts, especially for the IBM and Redhat talks.
Thanks a lot,
Sebastien