Re: [cdt-dev] CDT vs Eclipse30M5 vs binary project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] CDT vs Eclipse30M5 vs binary project

From: "Alain Magloire" <alain@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:50:22 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/cdt-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

> 
> That's funny, so have I. Did you follow the Eclipse 3.0 porting guide?
> 
> I was about to commit my changes so give me the word and It'll go.
> 

Go.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] CDT vs Eclipse30M5 vs binary project
  - From: Douglas Schaefer

References:
- Re: [cdt-dev] CDT vs Eclipse30M5 vs binary project
  - From: Douglas Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT vs Eclipse30M5 vs binary project
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT vs Eclipse30M5 vs binary project
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT vs Eclipse30M5 vs binary project
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT vs Eclipse30M5 vs binary project
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs