Re: [cdt-dev] Updated CDT 2.0 Plan

[Douglas Schaefer <dschaefe@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Cool! This would help me with the little GTK app I've started writing 
(hint, I could use gtkmm. wink, wink, nudge, nudge).

When you say kick it out to real world, do you mean contribute it to the 
CDT? Or will you use another vehicle to deliver it?

Cheers,
Doug Schaefer, Senior Software Developer
IBM Rational Software, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada



Chris Moller <cmoller@xxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
10/16/2003 12:01 PM
Please respond to
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx


To
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
cc

Subject
Re: [cdt-dev] Updated CDT 2.0 Plan






I've got a text hover extension just about ready for internal beta -- I 
was hoping for this week, but probably slipping to next.  It will 
provide a descriptive pop-up when you park the pointer over a function 
name and possibly, later, over typedefs, structs, enums, etc. -- 
whatever I can find decent info for.  First pass will include support 
for glibc, GTK+, GDK, and, maybe, Xlib, Xt, Xmu, etc. depending on how 
fast I can write a parser for the X docs.

We're going to kick it around inside RedHat for a while, then probably 
kick it out of the nest and into the real world -- haven't a clue when 
that will be.

Chris Moller
Senior Tinker
Red Hat, Inc.

Thomas Fletcher wrote:
> Just a note to developers/lurkers out there.  I'd really like to
> see input (not necessarily commitments, just acknowledgements and
> statements about feature development priorities) from some of the 
> other CDT participants so that this doesn't become the QNX/Rational-IBM
> show =;-)
> 
> Thanks,
>  Thomas ... don't let others vote for you! 
> 

_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev