glossary, please! was: [buckminster-dev] component binding

[Thomas L Roche <tlroche@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Knut Wannheden wrote:
>> In the latest updates to the documentation I read that you now also
>> use the term artifact to refer to components. I assume that is the
>> case above. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Thomas Hallgren Wed, 18 Jan 2006 17:38:17 +0100
> You're not wrong :-) We have still to establish a "correct" glossary
> at some point.

Please, ...

> I'll try to differentiate between the terms component and artifact
> in the future.

... especially since "component" appears to be the single most
overloaded term in informatics today.