Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] declare annotations within aop.xml 
Hi,

It is an ordering issue I think - I can recreate it in pure source
compilation too if I pass the files in using a particular order.  I've
raised https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=376030 to cover
it.

cheers,
Andy

On 3 April 2012 07:04, Dominik Mengelt <dominik.mengelt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Thank you so much!
>
> Unfortunately we have a little ltw vs. source weaving problem. Consider I
> have the following setup:
>
> Source Weaving:
> ##############
>
> package ch.annotation;
> import java.lang.annotation.ElementType;
> import java.lang.annotation.Retention;
> import java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy;
> import java.lang.annotation.Target;
>
> @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
> @Target(ElementType.FIELD)
> public @interface Anno {
>
> }
>
> package ch.aspects;
>
> import ch.annotation.Anno;
>
> public aspect TriggerAll {
> declare @field : * *.myInt : @Anno;
> before(Anno anno) : @annotation(anno) && set(* *.myInt) {
>       System.out.println("Triggered");
>     }
> }
>
> package ch.tests;
>
> public class MyObject {
> public int myInt;
>
> public int getMyInt() {
> return myInt;
> }
>
> public void setMyInt(int myInt) {
> this.myInt = myInt;
> }
> }
>
> package ch.tests;
>
> public class Main {
>
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> MyObject mo = new MyObject();
> mo.myInt = 13;
> mo.setMyInt(13);
> }
> }
>
> This outputs:
> Triggered
> Triggered
>
> // two times "Triggered". As expected.
>
> Now LTW:
> ########
>
> Infos:
> - -javaagent:lib/aspectjweaver.jar is set
> - the compiled aspect "TriggerAll.aj" is in the class searchpath (classpath)
> packed within a jar file.
>
> public class MyObject2 {
> public int myInt;
>
> public int getMyInt() {
> return myInt;
> }
>
> public void setMyInt(int myInt) {
> this.myInt = myInt;
> }
> }
>
> public class Main {
>
> public static void main(String[] args) {
> MyObject2 mo = new MyObject2();
> mo.myInt = 13;
> mo.setMyInt(13);
> }
> }
>
> This outputs:
> Triggered
> // just one "Triggered" message. And this comes from mo.setMyInt(13).
>
> So mo.myInt = 13 does not trigger the pointcut!
>
> Note: It has nothing to do with your recent changes. This happens on AspectJ
> 1.6.12.
>
> Output form the weaving "process":
>
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] info AspectJ Weaver Version 1.6.12 built on
> Tuesday Oct 18, 2011 at 17:52:06 GMT
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] info register classloader
> sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader@5acac268
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] info using configuration /path/META-INF/aop.xml
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] info using configuration
> /other-path/lib/TriggerAll.jar!/META-INF/aop-ajc.xml
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] info register aspect ch.aspects.TriggerAll
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] info weaver operating in reweavable mode.  Need to
> verify any required types exist.
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] debug weaving 'Main'
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] debug weaving 'MyObject2'
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] weaveinfo 'public int myInt' of type 'MyObject2'
> (MyObject2.java) is annotated with @Anno field annotation from
> 'ch.aspects.TriggerAll' (TriggerAll.aj:6)
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] weaveinfo Join point 'field-set(int
> MyObject2.myInt)' in Type 'MyObject2' (MyObject2.java:11) advised by before
> advice from 'ch.aspects.TriggerAll' (TriggerAll.aj:8)
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] debug weaving 'ch.aspects.TriggerAll'
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] info processing reweavable type
> ch.aspects.TriggerAll: ch\aspects\TriggerAll.aj
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] debug cannot weave
> 'org.aspectj.lang.NoAspectBoundException'
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] debug weaving 'ch.annotation.Anno'
> [AppClassLoader@5acac268] debug weaving '$Proxy3'
> Triggered
>
> But again: Thanks very much for you effort,
> domi
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> Ok, implemented under https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=375881
>>
>> Dev build is on the downloads page or here:
>>
>> http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/download.php?file=/tools/aspectj/dev/aspectj-DEVELOPMENT-20120402142200.jar
>>
>> It enables you to write declare-annotation segments in the
>> concrete-aspect section of aop.xml.  Here is one of my testcase XMLs:
>>
>> <aspectj>
>>  <aspects>
>>    <concrete-aspect name="ConjuredUp">
>>      <declare-annotation field="* field1"
>> annotation="@Annot(someBoolean = false,   'abc'  )"/>
>>    </concrete-aspect>
>>  </aspects>
>>
>>  <weaver options="-Xreweavable -verbose -XlazyTjp -showWeaveInfo">
>>    <include within="Hello6"/>
>>  </weaver>
>> </aspectj>
>>
>> You can use field or method (to indicate declare @field or declare
>> @method), you cannot specify type yet.  All annotation value types are
>> supported apart from arrays and nested annotations.  Notice to avoid
>> the need to write double quotes as &quot;, you can use single quotes
>> for strings.  If you are using a class reference it must either be in
>> java.lang or fully qualified.
>>
>> There is still more error checking code to go in but hopefully you can
>> use it as it is now.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Andy
>>
>> On 1 April 2012 07:51, Dominik Mengelt <dominik.mengelt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Andy,
>> >
>> > Thanks for your efforts. It is really appreciated.
>> >
>> >> I suspect markers wont be enough for you?  If so if you can tell me
>> >> the types of value (string,int, etc) you need to specify in the
>> >> annotation I'll do those first.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thats correct. I need the following types:
>> >
>> > - string
>> > - long
>> > - boolean
>> > - class
>> >
>> > It would be great to have a dev / nightly build with the ability to
>> > define
>> > annotations within the aop.xml
>> >
>> > thanks again,
>> > domi
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > So I'm curious if there are currently any plans to implement this
>> >> > feature or
>> >> > can anybody provide an alternate solution to this problem?
>> >>
>> >> I didn't have plans but as you are asking for it I've done a bit of
>> >> hacking this morning.  I can currently add annotations to
>> >> fields/methods but only simple marker annotations.
>> >>
>> >> I can do this
>> >>
>> >> <declare-annotation method="* foo(..))" annotation="@Marker"/>
>> >>
>> >> you cannot say
>> >>
>> >> annotation="@Marker(x=y,z=a)"
>> >>
>> >> I suspect markers wont be enough for you?  If so if you can tell me
>> >> the types of value (string,int, etc) you need to specify in the
>> >> annotation I'll do those first. (Obviously supporting all of them
>> >> would be nice, but not sure i have time to do that right now).
>> >>
>> >> Also declare @type won't work right now.
>> >>
>> >> cheers,
>> >> Andy
>> >>
>> >> On 30 March 2012 04:30, Dominik Mengelt <dominik.mengelt@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Hi all,
>> >> >
>> >> > I'm interested in the possibility to declare field and method
>> >> > annotations
>> >> > directly on concrete aspects in an aop.xml. Basically I have the same
>> >> > "problem / feature request" as Thomas on the following post:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/abstract-quot-declare-method-quot-td3823887.html
>> >> >
>> >> > What I also found is the following enhancement request from Andrew:
>> >> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=359159
>> >> >
>> >> > On the end of comment 1 Andrew says:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "A similar model could be extended to
>> >> >> support any declares too (anntation/parents)".
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > So I'm curious if there are currently any plans to implement this
>> >> > feature or
>> >> > can anybody provide an alternate solution to this problem?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks in advance.
>> >> >
>> >> > Domi
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > aspectj-users mailing list
>> >> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> aspectj-users mailing list
>> >> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > aspectj-users mailing list
>> > aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-users mailing list
>> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>

Back to the top