On 1 April 2012 07:51, Dominik Mengelt <
dominik.mengelt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andy,
>
> Thanks for your efforts. It is really appreciated.
>
>> I suspect markers wont be enough for you? If so if you can tell me
>> the types of value (string,int, etc) you need to specify in the
>> annotation I'll do those first.
>
>
> Thats correct. I need the following types:
>
> - string
> - long
> - boolean
> - class
>
> It would be great to have a dev / nightly build with the ability to define
> annotations within the aop.xml
>
> thanks again,
> domi
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Andy Clement <
andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>>
>> > So I'm curious if there are currently any plans to implement this
>> > feature or
>> > can anybody provide an alternate solution to this problem?
>>
>> I didn't have plans but as you are asking for it I've done a bit of
>> hacking this morning. I can currently add annotations to
>> fields/methods but only simple marker annotations.
>>
>> I can do this
>>
>> <declare-annotation method="* foo(..))" annotation="@Marker"/>
>>
>> you cannot say
>>
>> annotation="@Marker(x=y,z=a)"
>>
>> I suspect markers wont be enough for you? If so if you can tell me
>> the types of value (string,int, etc) you need to specify in the
>> annotation I'll do those first. (Obviously supporting all of them
>> would be nice, but not sure i have time to do that right now).
>>
>> Also declare @type won't work right now.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Andy
>>
>> On 30 March 2012 04:30, Dominik Mengelt <
dominik.mengelt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > I'm interested in the possibility to declare field and method
>> > annotations
>> > directly on concrete aspects in an aop.xml. Basically I have the same
>> > "problem / feature request" as Thomas on the following post:
>> >
>> >
http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/abstract-quot-declare-method-quot-td3823887.html
>> >
>> > What I also found is the following enhancement request from Andrew:
>> >
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=359159
>> >
>> > On the end of comment 1 Andrew says:
>> >
>> >> "A similar model could be extended to
>> >> support any declares too (anntation/parents)".
>> >
>> >
>> > So I'm curious if there are currently any plans to implement this
>> > feature or
>> > can anybody provide an alternate solution to this problem?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > Domi
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > aspectj-users mailing list
>> >
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> aspectj-users mailing list
>>
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
>
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users