Re: [aspectj-users] declare annotations within aop.xml

[Dominik Mengelt <dominik.mengelt@xxxxxxxxx>]

Andy,

Thanks for your efforts. It is really appreciated.

> I suspect markers wont be enough for you?  If so if you can tell me
> the types of value (string,int, etc) you need to specify in the
> annotation I'll do those first.

Thats correct. I need the following types:

- string

- long

- boolean

- class

It would be great to have a dev / nightly build with the ability to define annotations within the aop.xml

thanks again,

domi

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Andy Clement <andrew.clement@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So I'm curious if there are currently any plans to implement this feature or
> can anybody provide an alternate solution to this problem?

I didn't have plans but as you are asking for it I've done a bit of
hacking this morning.  I can currently add annotations to
fields/methods but only simple marker annotations.

I can do this

<declare-annotation method="* foo(..))" annotation="@Marker"/>

you cannot say

annotation="@Marker(x=y,z=a)"

I suspect markers wont be enough for you?  If so if you can tell me
the types of value (string,int, etc) you need to specify in the
annotation I'll do those first. (Obviously supporting all of them
would be nice, but not sure i have time to do that right now).

Also declare @type won't work right now.

cheers,
Andy

On 30 March 2012 04:30, Dominik Mengelt <dominik.mengelt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm interested in the possibility to declare field and method annotations
> directly on concrete aspects in an aop.xml. Basically I have the same
> "problem / feature request" as Thomas on the following post:
> http://aspectj.2085585.n4.nabble.com/abstract-quot-declare-method-quot-td3823887.html
>
> What I also found is the following enhancement request from Andrew:
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=359159
>
> On the end of comment 1 Andrew says:
>
>> "A similar model could be extended to
>> support any declares too (anntation/parents)".
>
>
> So I'm curious if there are currently any plans to implement this feature or
> can anybody provide an alternate solution to this problem?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Domi
>

> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users