[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [aspectj-users] field name conflict

Looks like a bug to me. AspectJ compiler should treat ITDs of privileged aspect as if there are public introduction overriding any access specification on the declaration itself.

-Ramnivas

On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Dehua Zhang <dehua.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

See the sample code below,

public class OneType {
       private String r;
}

privileged aspect A {
       private int OneType.r; //no error
}

Since aspect A is declared as privileged, so it should have access to the private filed "String OneType.r", therefore, the ITD "int OneType.r" is conflict with the "String OneType.r", I got no warning regarding this.

However, I got an error for the following code,
privileged aspect A {
       public int OneType.r; //[error] inter-type declaration from A conflicts with existing member: java.lang.String onType.r
}


Is this an intended behavior or a bug? I tried both 1.5.4 and DEVELOPMENT-20080125213731.

--
Dehua Zhang
Sable Research Group, McGill University
Montréal, Québec, Canada
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dzhang25

_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users