[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [aspectj-users] field name conflict
|
Looks like a bug to me. AspectJ compiler should treat ITDs of privileged aspect as if there are public introduction overriding any access specification on the declaration itself.
-Ramnivas
On Mon, Feb 4, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Dehua Zhang <
dehua.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
See the sample code below,
public class OneType {
private String r;
}
privileged aspect A {
private int OneType.r; //no error
}
Since aspect A is declared as privileged, so it should have access to the private filed "String OneType.r", therefore, the ITD "int OneType.r" is conflict with the "String OneType.r", I got no warning regarding this.
However, I got an error for the following code,
privileged aspect A {
public int OneType.r; //[error] inter-type declaration from A conflicts with existing member: java.lang.String onType.r
}
Is this an intended behavior or a bug? I tried both 1.5.4 and DEVELOPMENT-20080125213731.
--
Dehua Zhang
Sable Research Group, McGill University
Montréal, Québec, Canada
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~dzhang25
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
