Bug 42076 - Preferences > Workbench > Keys: Empty dialog with edit problems
Summary: Preferences > Workbench > Keys: Empty dialog with edit problems
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 42009
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.0   Edit
Hardware: PC Linux-GTK
: P2 major (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Chris McLaren CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-08-27 02:27 EDT by markusle CLA
Modified: 2003-08-27 10:21 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description markusle CLA 2003-08-27 02:27:36 EDT 
Hello,

I'm update from
   linux_i386.eclipse_gtk_2003_07_30
to
   eclipse-SDK-I20030826-linux-gtk.zip
and tried to use the Comment-Command with the key sequence
    CTRL-SHIFT-7
and in the editor a underlined 7 appears, an no line was
commented with //.
The I looked at the dialog
    Preferences > Workbench > Keys
and there as no key defined. I tried to define
    CTRL-SHIFT-7 with command "comment"
and that failed again.

I work under SuSE Linux 7.2.

Kind regards
Comment 1 Tod Creasey CLA 2003-08-27 09:04:24 EDT 
May be a dup of Bug 42042
Comment 2 Tod Creasey CLA 2003-08-27 09:07:24 EDT 
I meant  Bug 42041
Comment 3 Douglas Pollock CLA 2003-08-27 09:46:31 EDT 
This is a duplicate of 42009, which is the Platform equivalent of 41884.  This
is a GTK-specific bug, which SWT has declared unfixable.  This bug exists in
I20030717 (which predates the new key binding architecture), from which I can
only assume that it is not related to anything we've done (at least with the key
binding work).
Comment 4 Tod Creasey CLA 2003-08-27 09:52:46 EDT 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 42009 ***
Comment 5 markusle CLA 2003-08-27 10:02:00 EDT 
The reported bug is unfixable and exist in I20030717,
then this bug must exist in the build with:
    Build ID: 200307300800
Right? If so then I have to say this bug in another bug,
because 
   My problem don't exist in: Build ID: 200307300800
Comment 6 Douglas Pollock CLA 2003-08-27 10:21:22 EDT 
This bug is a duplicate.  I've moved your comments to 42009.  Please post future
comments there.  Thanks.