Bug 252813 - Branding
Summary: Branding
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Simultaneous Release
Classification: Eclipse Foundation
Component: Prereq (show other bugs)
Version: Galileo   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P1 normal (vote)
Target Milestone: RC1   Edit
Assignee: Simultaneous Release Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 252846 254286 254289 254290 254291 254292 254293 254294 254295 254296 254297 254298 254299 254300 254301 254302 254303 254304 254305 254306 254307 254308 254309 254310 254311 254312 257307 257499 257580 257894 258611 260156 262487 263345 263373 263401
Blocks: 258479
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-10-30 12:51 EDT by Bjorn Freeman-Benson CLA
Modified: 2011-02-25 16:48 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Bjorn Freeman-Benson CLA 2008-10-30 12:51:05 EDT
Each major project (the top-level projects except for the Tools and Technology projects where it is the sub-projects) should have an About dialog icon and contribute to the welcome page.
Comment 1 Richard Gronback CLA 2008-12-03 14:09:56 EST
Per the last Planning Council call, it was decided that the this requirement should be a must-do, so bumping priority to P1.

Furthermore, as discussed in bug 198941, the About dialog text for contributed features/bundles should be more descriptive than simply "Eclipse.org" (e.g. Eclipse Modeling Project).  PMCs are responsible for determining the appropriate provider names for their project(s), which is an update to the explicit mention of Tools and Technology above.
Comment 2 Martin Oberhuber CLA 2008-12-03 15:14:00 EST
I suppose that dependent bug's priorities should be bumped to P1 as well?

Can anybody recommend a graphic artist to produce a nice "Eclipse like" icon? I like the existing ones (such as modeling) very much, but don't know where to get one for DSDP.
Comment 3 Richard Gronback CLA 2008-12-03 15:41:39 EST
(In reply to comment #2)
> I suppose that dependent bug's priorities should be bumped to P1 as well?

Indeed.  Maybe we can enlist Anne's help again? ;)

> Can anybody recommend a graphic artist to produce a nice "Eclipse like" icon? I
> like the existing ones (such as modeling) very much, but don't know where to
> get one for DSDP.

We ran a contest, following the lead of WebTools (see bug 154906)

Comment 4 David Williams CLA 2009-03-30 15:47:36 EDT
To clarify the "Provider name" rules, the Planning council has stated the following. We realize there may be other issues such as exactly what the right level of granularity is. We believe it best to leave that up to PMCs, and the community can provide feedback if they do not like what they see. 



# Provider name should always start with "Eclipse ..." followed by project name. It is (still) up to each PMC to decide how best to describe their project in a meaningful, balanced fashion (either as one top level one or as multiple pieces). Avoid special symbols (e.g. ':' or "-") unless they are part of the project name. Avoid acronyms (unless in common use in software industry, such as XML, or PHP). Capitalization should follow "headline-sytyle capitalization": The only words that are not capitalized are articles (except as the first word), coordinating conjunctions (for example, and, but, and or), prepositions (except as the first or last word), and the to in an infinitive. )

# For now, only the branding/primary feature is important to get right. Long term, all plugins and features should use the correct "Provider Name", same as that branding plugin/feature, but we do not encourage a lot of last minute touching of plugins just to fix the provider name. It can be phased in when other changes are made to those plugins, if desired. 
Comment 5 David Williams CLA 2009-10-09 13:14:08 EDT
THis is a routine mass closing of the previous release umbrella tracking bugs.