Bug 241077 - [Dialogs] Handling selection of 4 and more resources in Compare with Other dialog
Summary: [Dialogs] Handling selection of 4 and more resources in Compare with Other di...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Platform
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: Compare (show other bugs)
Version: 3.4   Edit
Hardware: All All
: P5 enhancement (vote)
Target Milestone: ---   Edit
Assignee: Platform-Compare-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 239959 244623
Blocks: 224562
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-07-16 08:56 EDT by Aleksandra Wozniak CLA
Modified: 2018-06-29 06:53 EDT (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Aleksandra Wozniak CLA 2008-07-16 08:56:40 EDT
The Compare with Other Resource action is enabled for one or more selected items in Package Explorer. However, when four or more files are selected Compare with Other dialog is populated with only three first items. The question is: what  should be done with other selected resources? One option is to add them to a drop down menu for every field in the dialog -- but this would mix them with history items.
Comment 1 Aleksandra Wozniak CLA 2008-07-17 11:49:10 EDT
One option is to construct drop down menu for each file as follows: 

--- previously added ---
/dir1/file1
/dir2/file2
...
--- initially selected ---
/dir3/file3
/dir4/file2
...

Since SWT combo doesn't support separators, adding items such as "--- previously added ---" and "--- initially selected ---" is the only option. 

Another idea is to use additional combo field or a list populated with all selected items (located i.e. to the right from the "file" panels). One could then drag desired resources to one of the sections.
Comment 2 Tomasz Zarna CLA 2008-07-21 06:45:18 EDT
IMO this bug has the lowest priority comparing to others you're working on. I think we can come back to it later. Lowering Priority.
Comment 3 Lars Vogel CLA 2018-06-29 06:53:45 EDT
After 10 years, lets assume this low prio item will not be worked on.