Bug 127169 - Downstream plugin.xmls not rechecked when extension point deleted
Summary: Downstream plugin.xmls not rechecked when extension point deleted
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 220109
Alias: None
Product: PDE
Classification: Eclipse Project
Component: UI (show other bugs)
Version: 3.2   Edit
Hardware: PC Windows 2000
: P3 major (vote)
Target Milestone: 3.4 RC1   Edit
Assignee: PDE-UI-Inbox CLA
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: bugday, helpwanted
: 60087 94396 128955 205552 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-09 16:48 EST by Nick Edgar CLA
Modified: 2008-05-08 11:03 EDT (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Nick Edgar CLA 2006-02-09 16:48:17 EST 
build I20060208

- deleted the services extension point from org.eclipse.ui (and saved the plugin.xml)
- there were extensions to it in org.eclipse.ui.ide, but they did not get flagged as errors
- touched the plugin.xml file, and it then found the errors.

Expectation: it should recheck any plugins with extensions to a deleted extension point.
Comment 1 Wassim Melhem CLA 2006-02-22 11:22:07 EST 
*** Bug 128955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Wassim Melhem CLA 2006-02-28 22:58:08 EST 
*** Bug 60087 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Brian Bauman CLA 2007-10-12 12:09:41 EDT 
*** Bug 205552 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Brian Bauman CLA 2007-10-12 12:11:49 EDT 
I can investigate if this can be done with the addition of the extension registry support.
Comment 5 Brian Bauman CLA 2007-10-12 13:34:02 EDT 
*** Bug 94396 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Markus Keller CLA 2007-11-29 03:53:26 EST 
I always lose a lot of time when this happens. Setting to major.
Comment 7 Chris Aniszczyk CLA 2008-03-08 17:00:17 EST 
marking bugday
Comment 8 Chris Aniszczyk CLA 2008-04-24 05:17:00 EDT 
This will have to wait for RC1, I consider this more of a bug than an enhancement.
Comment 9 Chris Aniszczyk CLA 2008-05-08 11:03:39 EDT 
I am classifying this is an enhancement request as this requires PDE to implement a delete participant which we never had. I am going to mark this as a dupe of bug 220109.

Sorry for making people wait on this issue.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 220109 ***