Hi Everyone,
The
Science TLP document is here.
Baring any objections articulated on the list or to me in private
by tomorrow morning (EDT), I'll send out an email to all Science
WG members to ask them to support (+1) abstain (0) or vote against
(-1) accepting this Science Top Level Project Charter.
Members will have 10 days maximum to vote.
Once the results are in, I'll report on them to the Steering
Committee & group as I proposed.
Kind regards,
Andrea
On 29/06/16 11:19, Torkild U. Resheim wrote:
Thanks Andrea,
Yes, I’d go for option B too. Simple majority
decides. And we need to publish the amended TLP proposal
somewhere. I cannot seem to find it.
Best regards,
Torkild
Hey Torkild,
Here's a few options.
Option A: The Foundation does have infrastructure for
this but it's a bit heavyweight for this, in my
opinion.
Option B: I'd be happy to run the vote on behalf of
the group. What I'll likely do is just email all the
member representatives and ask them to please reply
with their vote, and then I'll report on the outcome.
For transparency's sake, I can share the who voted
what with the Steering Committee.
Option C: If we wanted a completely public vote, we'd
simply ask for +1/0/-1 here on the list.
I recommend Option B, for what that's worth.
Andrea
On 28/06/16 16:53, Torkild U. Resheim wrote:
Hi all,
If we’re going to make all 15 members
vote I think we should make the voting process a bit
more formal and also make some effort to ensure that
members with voting rights are aware of what is
going on. I think several representatives could be
on vacation already. It starts early, in northern
Europe at least. Andrea, do the Foundation offer any
infrastructure we can use for this purpose?
Best regards,
Torkild
Or, as Greg says, we can
just say "Go!" and wait 10 days. That
works too.
Jay
|