Re: [science-iwg] Vote on TLP

[Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Andrea,

In general I would agree with you, but having the steering committee get the sole deciding votes on something as important our own TLP seems unfair. I mean, honestly, I think everyone will vote "Yes," but I think everyone would like the chance to say they voted on "our TLP" just like they voted on "our charter." Just seems more fair to me, that's all.

Greg, I think institutional votes for participating and steering committee members will be fine. It would be one vote per organization in that case.

If there are no objections I say that we start the vote by roll call?

Jay

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Andrea Ross <andrea.ross@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jay,

For what it's worth, this is what the Steering Committee is meant for.

Kind regards,

Andrea

On 28/06/16 11:50, Jay Jay Billings wrote:

Everyone,

What's the best way to hold the vote on our amended TLP that Mike presented? Furthermore, who will be eligible to vote?

Jay

_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg

_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg

--

Jay Jay Billings

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings