| Re: [science-iwg] Project recommendations |
Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Project recommendations (UOMo)
2. Re: Project recommendations (Mike Milinkovich)
3. Re: Project recommendations (Jay Jay Billings)
4. Re: Science Top Level Project (Philip Wenig)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 20:49:26 +0200
From: UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Project recommendations
Message-ID:
<CAAGawe2MnwETO5wUvRwW7_V6=JMSWhRrHwm4VGCv-i3r8c1GMg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Marcel,
Thanks for the clarification. If you're in Kiel maybe we could have a chat
and beer some time while I still work here (till late May)
I have not analyzed in detail which parts of JScience you use, but thanks
to CQs raised by projects like SmartHome we hope to get the successor to
JSR-275, 363 into Orbit pretty soon, too. How soon projects like GeoAPI or
JScience pick up the new standard I can't say, but it allows streamlining
earlier APIs like 275 over time. And should you use any of the
javax.measure part of JScience I'd certainly recommend moving to JSR 363
implementations soon, since it should get a final release unlike 275 soon
;-)
Werner
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:37 PM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Project recommendations (Austenfeld, Marcel)
> 2. Re: Science Top Level Project (Jay Jay Billings)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:31:53 +0000
> From: "Austenfeld, Marcel" <maustenfeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Science Industry Working Group <science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Project recommendations
> Message-ID:
> <30EEDB13B7204941866741713C7D550C0B5E982B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> First of all thanks for the recommendation Phillip.
>
> @Werner: Yes, Bio7 2.0 is licensed under the EPL but I still use one or
> two science libs which are licensed under the LGPL
> (e.g. the for me important Rserve lib is licensed under the LGPL).
> Of course some of these libraries could be externalized to an update site
> or are even deprecated and could be left out.
>
> @Jay: To be an official Eclipse project would certainly offer some great
> advantages. At the Eclipse Con I met some fine
> and inspiring people and projects. And networking increases definitely the
> productivitiy.
>
> Best regards
>
> Marcel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Von: science-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [science-iwg-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]"
> im Auftrag von "UOMo [uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 18:06
> An: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Betreff: Re: [science-iwg] Project recommendations
>
> I would certainly love to, given Bio7 at least in in some bundles uses
> JSR-275 via JScience 4: http://bio7.org/?page_id=10
>
>
> Werner
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Project recommendations (UOMo)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 17:40:38 +0200
> From: UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Project recommendations
> Message-ID:
> <CAAGawe2o9Q5xWJeohD-htBaYKoC=D8Hv6BCOwem=
> WsXMov8-fg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:WsXMov8-fg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Well it was: licensed under the EPL (since Bio7 1.6) and GPL (Bio7 1.5)
>
> When I clicked on the link there was some page saying GPL or LGPL. Maybe
> parts of the site still refer to 1.5?;-)
>
> If Marcel is currently in Kiel, maybe I'll have a chat with him while I am
> still in the area.
>
> Werner
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:32 PM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> > Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
> > science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:
> science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."
>
> _______________________________________________
> science-iwg mailing list
> science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
>
> End of science-iwg Digest, Vol 27, Issue 16
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-iwg/attachments/20150408/bd8e795d/attachment.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:10:54 -0400
From: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Project recommendations
Message-ID: <55258B4E.7040701@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
On 08/04/2015 11:57 AM, Philip Wenig wrote:
> I already spoke with Christoph and Egon. They are willing to
> dual-license the CDK under the LGPL and MIT or BSD license.
> Nonetheless, the best would be if they could also join the Science WG :-).
I have to be honest: I am not sure that I could get the Eclipse Board to
agree to an LGPL-licensed project at Eclipse, even if it is
dual-licensed with MIT or BSD. It is not completely out of the question,
but it would most certainly be a significant risk.
Would EPL+BSD be an option? I am not a lawyer, but I cannot think of a
scenario where that combination would harm the existing adopters. Anyone
using the code from the (L)GPL world would continue to do so under the BSD.
--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx
+1.613.220.3223 (mobile)
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 19:30:24 -0400
From: Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mike Milinkovich <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Science Industry
Working Group <science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Project recommendations
Message-ID:
<CAE3ybv6t0rN6rmB3jzM8Z_H_a2yDx87X6xpQb0Y5fhPahwLDVw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
FWIW, that is essentially why ORNL's default OSS license is New BSD.
Jay
On Apr 8, 2015 4:11 PM, "Mike Milinkovich" <mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 11:57 AM, Philip Wenig wrote:
_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
End of science-iwg Digest, Vol 27, Issue 17
*******************************************