Re: [nebula-dev] CDatetimes Dual Life

[Tom Schindl <listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jeremy,

Thanks for the clarification. I highly appreciate your work on this 
really nice widget.

Tom

Jeremy Dowdall schrieb:
> Stick with the Nebula version.
> I think my comment of "reopened development" greatly overshadowed my 
> comment on experimenting with other widgets and core components.  The 
> Nebula CDateTime is currently the exact same thing it was last week, 
> except that in a couple weeks some of the SF based experiments will 
> stabilize and be brought over.  Naturally, before doing so there will be 
> discussion of anything that may impact customers (such as API changes) 
> and we'll make sure that all IP is in order.
> I'll follow up with more when I have time (probably over the weekend) 
> and once Peter and I have discussed it further, but overall rest assured 
> that Nebula is where the you'll find the production release of 
> CDateTime, and I am not planning on changing that.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:32 AM, Tom Schindl <listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:listom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I'd like to have this is a seperate thread not bound to the project
>     state and making nebula more attractive discussion.
>
>     I have to make a descision which widget we I choose for my customers
>     standard date implementation. Which one do you Peter and/or Jeremey
>     suggest? If I read Peter's mail correctly I should go with the one
>     from SF.
>
>     Tom
>     _______________________________________________
>     nebula-dev mailing list
>     nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>     https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> nebula-dev mailing list
> nebula-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/nebula-dev