Re: [ide-dev] Development Process was Re: Why we dropped Eclipse in favo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [ide-dev] Development Process was Re: Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks

From: Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:17:39 -0400
Delivered-to: ide-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ide-dev>
List-help: <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ide-dev>, <mailto:ide-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8

Can you be specific? What aspects of the EDP are a big issue?

I don't believe that you're using the term "review" in the same sense as the EDP. AFAICT, nothing in your post is a limitation imposed by the EDP.

I'm in the process of wrapping up a new draft of the EDP. If there's something that we can change to reduce friction, I'd like to explore it.

Wayne

On 09/24/2013 04:25 PM, Miles Parker wrote:

length of time for reviews and overall EDP friction is a _big_ issue.

--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects, The Eclipse Foundation
Learn about Eclipse Projects

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ide-dev] Development Process was Re: Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Miles Parker

References:
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: David M Williams
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Andrew Eisenberg
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Miles Parker
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Konstantin Komissarchik
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: John Arthorne
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Konstantin Komissarchik
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Pascal Rapicault
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Miles Parker
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: John Arthorne
- Re: [ide-dev] Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Mickael Istria
- [ide-dev] Development Process was Re: Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
  - From: Miles Parker

Prev by Date: Re: [ide-dev] Development Process
Next by Date: Re: [ide-dev] Development Process was Re: Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Previous by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Development Process
Next by thread: Re: [ide-dev] Development Process was Re: Why we dropped Eclipse in favour of IntelliJ | Java Code Geeks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs