[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems
- From: Carsten Reckord <reckord@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:07:14 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US, de-DE
- Delivered-to: email@example.com
- Thread-index: AQHSqW6ACJofw8U1t0i7AA5D/6VxhqGttMrg
- Thread-topic: Neon.3 Update Problems
Well, the good news is that the httpclient 4.5 bundle didn't make it into any of the packages as far as I can see.
I've just had a look at the latest Neon repository metadata, and there are a lot of bundles that require a httpclient < 4.5 , and apparently only Linux Tools, that (by way of the Jersey Apache Connector) requires httpclient >= 4.5 . I think the safe bet would be for Linux Tools to do a release that uses the Neon Orbit to get rid of the newer httpclient if that's possible.
While in theory the two httpclient bundles should be able to work side-by-side, we've seen a lot of wiring issues in Oxygen due to the mix - some of which now apparently having propagated to Neon, as seen in the thread linked to by Ed. I'm very much in doubt that even using a fixed httpclient 4.5 bundle would solve these...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cross-project-issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cross-project-
> issues-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnston
> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 5:58 PM
> To: Cross project issues <cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Neon.3 Update Problems
> Regarding the Linux Tools issue. This was due to the Oxygen M4 orbit repo
> as part of a patch that upgraded the level of docker-client.
> I will cut a 5.3.1 release of Linux Tools today using the Orbit M6 repo.
> Can this be
> aggregated or used to patch the issue?
> -- Jeff J.
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Hi,
> > I'm concerned about the number of problems I see regarding updates to
> > For example, the missing MPC problem:
> > It looks just like the problem we've been having with Oxygen M5/M6. That
> > problem I believe traces back to a broken version of httpclient that
> > its way into Oxygen M5:
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=511333
> > Rather than immediately fixing the problem and fixing M5, the problem
> > allowed to propagate; weird and bizarre things were done to modify
> > downstream code to explicitly exclude the broken version:
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=511406
> > Of course such upper bound constraints also explicitly exclude the new
> > version when it came along, so now it seems M6 is also broken, because
> > wiring issues:
> > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=513809
> > I think the wiring issues arose to a large extent because of the things
> > during M5. In my opinion what should have happened in M5 is that the
> > bundle was immediately fixed (or reverted to the older version) and M5
> > respun to ensure that no broken version of httpclient ever propagated
> > further into the echo system. The last thing I would ever have expected
> > I personally would have refused to do) is for downstream clients to make
> > changes to explicitly exclude a broken version. Please let's never do
> > again. And please let's never behave as if the Eclipse Platform
> > build can't be respun to fix problem. Surely we can't have a policy in
> > where no matter the state of the platform's build, it must remain as is,
> > broken Orbit bundles and all.
> > But what seems even worse, though I don't fully understand the problem,
> > how this broken orbit bundle id='org.apache.httpcomponents.httpclient'
> > version='4.5.2.v20161115-1643' got into the Neon release train
> > Given all the problems it caused in Oxygen M5 surely we should have
> > that at all costs. I suspect it came from this repository:
> > http://download.eclipse.org/linuxtools/update-neon-docker
> > I say that because that repo contains the broken version of httpclient
> > the versions of the docker IUs in that repo are the same as the versions
> > the neon release train, so it seems to me the bundles from this repo
> > aggregated into Neon.
> > So now the problems we have in Oxygen M5 and M6 are also problems for
> > users of Neon.3. That makes me very sad. Users expect update releases to
> > stable. Surely we're doing something very wrong to get into a state
> where a
> > bundle known to be problematic nevertheless works its way into the final
> > stable update of the Neon...
> > I don't know if the EGit update problems are at all related:
> > It definitely looks like a different problem, but
> > org.slf4j.api_1.7.10.v20160921-1923 also comes from the update-neon-
> > update site. And that's not a version that's in
> > http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/latest-R , i.e., it
> > appears not to be a released version. So again, one has to wonder how
> > worked its way into Neon.3 causing update problems for Neon.3...
> > Regards,
> > Ed
> > _______________________________________________
> > cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> > cross-project-issues-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> > this list, visit
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cross-project-issues-dev
> cross-project-issues-dev mailing list
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
> from this list, visit