Re: [eclipse.org-planning-council] Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Re: Ec

[Scott Lewis <slewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

1) Most Ganymede projects/frameworks want to promote themselves with 
adopters
2) Not having Ganymede materials on the stick makes such promotion more 
difficult among EclipseCon attendees ('adopters' and 'users')...because 
the attendees have to do more to use/try/hear about those projects

Bjorn Freeman-Benson wrote:
> Scott,
> So now you've lost me - sorry for being dense, but how does having EPP 
> packages on the EclipseCon memory stick detract from project teams 
> recruiting more adopters? (Note that I'm using the term "adopter" to 
> mean someone who is building a product on top of Eclipse and "end 
> user" to mean someone who is using Eclipse, perhaps installing 
> additional plug-ins, but is not building a product on the frameworks 
> -- maybe the problem is that we're using the same words to talk about 
> different concepts?)
>
> - Bjorn
>
> Scott Lewis wrote:
> > But what's missing here is that many/most projects are typically 
> > looking to Ganymede, EPP packages and even EclipseCon itself to get 
> > more/new adopters...not just make the download easier for existing 
> > adopters.
>
> --
>
> [end of message]
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclipse.org-planning-council mailing list
> eclipse.org-planning-council@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipse.org-planning-council
>