Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [wtp-incubator-dev] Build problem. Missing EMF validation component

> And there is also the upcoming contribution to think about that 
> integrates the SAP NetWeaver runtime with the WTP Web services 
> wizard. Where that runtime name 'SAP NetWeaver' will be visible in 
> the WTP web services preferences and in the Web services wizard.
> What can we do there? 

I know I'm out of touch here, obviously, but ... what?! 
I assume there is no product specific runtime being contributed? Seems I 
would have heard about that. 
So if that is indeed the case, then perhaps you mean some "adapter" that 
interfaces the wizard with the runtime. If that's the case, then I'd first 
wonder what the adapter is doing in WTP? Why doesn't it stay with the 
runtime. That's 
the model we try to follow with server adapters, for example. It is nice 
to have an exemplary adapter in WTP, such as to the CXF runtime (if I've 
got my terminology correct) but that doesn't mean all adapters should be 
in WTP. 

Thanks in advance for educating me. 





From:
shane clarke <shane_clarke@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
<wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
09/28/2009 08:19 AM
Subject:
RE: [wtp-incubator-dev] Build problem. Missing EMF      validation 
component
Sent by:
wtp-incubator-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx



Along with renaming the package names this would also affect the features 
and plug-ins names and ids.

And there is also the upcoming contribution to think about that integrates 
the SAP NetWeaver runtime with the WTP Web services wizard. Where that 
runtime name 'SAP NetWeaver' will be visible in the WTP web services 
preferences and in the the Web services wizard. What can we do there? 

Shane

> From: danail.branekov@xxxxxxx
> To: wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:39:43 +0200
> Subject: RE: [wtp-incubator-dev] Build problem. Missing EMF validation 
component
> 
> You are right, we needed to separate the existing JAX-WS tooling from 
the newly contributed one.
> Would removing the "sapnw" fragment be OK? For example, 
"org.eclipse.jst.ws.jaxws.sapnw.dom.runtime" would result in 
"org.eclipse.jst.ws.jaxws.dom.runtime"
> 
> Shane, Oisin, do you have a better proposal?
> 
> Regards, Danail
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wtp-incubator-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [
mailto:wtp-incubator-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M 
Williams
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 10:38 AM
> To: WTP Incubator Dev list
> Subject: RE: [wtp-incubator-dev] Build problem. Missing EMF validation 
component
> 
> > Do you think that such a naming convention is some sort of issue?
> 
> Yes. Everything we do must be vendor neutral and having a product name 
> (basically) as part of a package name starts to crosses that line. Also, 

> remember, once code is donated to Eclipse under the EPL, the code itself 

> no longer "belongs" to any particular product or company and I think 
using 
> that convention in the package name could be misinterpreted. I'll assume 

> you were not consciously trying to promote SAP or advertise NetWeaver 
via 
> package names and instead it was just handy to use history in keeping 
> things straight. But, you'll need to find another way. Preferably based 
on 
> the function and architecture of the bundle and eventually have a fully 
> integrated set of bundles whose history does not matter, in the way you 
> organize it. 
> 
> Let me know if I can help in further discussions. 
> 
> Once you have moved/renamed the packages, let me know ... I'd like to 
> delete the other, then obsolete directories from CVS. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> "Branekov, Danail" <danail.branekov@xxxxxxx>
> To:
> WTP Incubator Dev list <wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> 09/28/2009 02:41 AM
> Subject:
> RE: [wtp-incubator-dev] Build problem. Missing EMF validation component
> Sent by:
> wtp-incubator-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> > As I started to look into it, I noticed some packages with 'sap' as 
part 
> 
> > of their name, such as 
> > org.eclipse.jst.ws.jaxws.sapnw.dom.runtime
> > 
> > What does that 'sap' stand for? Surely not 'SAP'?! 
> 
> The plugins which SAP contributed and will contribute to Eclipse 
originate 
> from a product called "SAP NetWeaver". This is what "sapnw" stands for. 
> Do you think that such a naming convention is some sort of issue?
> 
> Regards, Danail
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-incubator-dev mailing list
> wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-incubator-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-incubator-dev mailing list
> wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-incubator-dev
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-incubator-dev mailing list
> wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-incubator-dev

See all the ways you can stay connected to friends and family
_______________________________________________
wtp-incubator-dev mailing list
wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-incubator-dev





Back to the top