Hi Shane,
I see your point. Whether all the rules
are covered with the current with the existing rules can be easily checked by
the existing JUnit tests J In order to achieve this it would be only sufficient to replace
the texts of the error markers the junit test expects. If not everything is
covered, new rules could be implemented next to the existing ones.
Regards, Danail
From:
wtp-incubator-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wtp-incubator-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of shane clarke
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2009
3:19 PM
To: wtp-incubator-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LIKELY JUNK]RE:
[wtp-incubator-dev] Integrating the JAX-WS DOM Tools contribution
Hi Danail,
The move to JDT-APT isn't a priority. I do consider the WS wizard web service
runtime implementation - UI, commands, WSDL names collision contribution far
more important.
Just to be clear I'm not looking for the JAX-WS rules in the contribution to be
reimplemented in JDT-APT more would you guys be open to replacing those rules
with
the current ones in JAX-WS tools. As far as i can see we cover all the rules in
the contribution (need to double check that later).
Thanks,
Shane
See all the ways you can stay connected to
friends and family
