[wtp-incubator-dev] XSL checking as "nature + builder" vs "WTP validator

[Jesper Steen Møller <jesper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi guys

I'm porting over the validation + UI portions of the X-Assist plugins, 
adding some validation tricks as I go.

We've previously discussed whether to use a XSL validator or a specific 
XSL project nature with a builder.
In light of the new validation framework to appear in the next major WTP 
[1] I think it would make the most sense to stick with the "WTP 
validation" direction, primarily because it makes the XSL support work 
"out of the box" and in a less intrusive manner.
In fact, I'd rather do it this way, and then in return help out on the 
validation UI stuff to make it on par with the user experience of the 
Java tooling, as suggested by Dave.
I should be able to make it backwards compatible with the current WTP 
2.0 as well.

Comments anyone?

-Jesper

[1]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=212196