[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [wtp-dev] Regression in Java EE / EJB component
|
The same fix also takes care of 209264, which has a lot
worse of an affect on the user. Given the simplicity of the fix and the fact
that two issues will be resolved, I went ahead and released. I think it makes
sense to respin to pickup this change for this week's I-build. No re-testing
should be required.
I am looking at 209268 now. That problem doesn't
look as severe as the first two. The add to ear option on project
creation is not working for any project type. There are no errors displayed
or logged. There is a simple workaround (use j2ee module dependencies to
make the link later). This issue should't to preclude declaration of this
i-build, but should be fixed for final m3 build.
- Konstantin
hmm.. I took a look at the scenario
and although the "Context Root" field is empty if you click Finish
the field get populated correctly. In my opinion, the fact that field gets populated if you click Finish
makes the defect not a major one. It would be major if it leads to user to
some state where he can't deploy the application or his application doesn't work
and it is difficult to find it how the application is broken. But in this case,
if the user doesn't notice the empty field, everything will still work. Because
of this I do not think it is a candidate for a re-spin.
Best Regards,
-- --
Mr. Angel Vera
Server Tools Developer for WTP and Rational
Lotus Notes: Angel
Vera/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Tel: 905-413-5919 - E-Mail:
arvera@xxxxxxxxxx
-----
Those who think that something is
impossible,
should not interfere with those who are willing to do it. - Angel
Vera
"Konstantin Komissarchik"
<kosta@xxxxxxx> Sent by:
wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
11/08/2007 04:42 PM
Please respond
to "General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."
<wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
To
| "General discussion of project-wide
or architectural issues." <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| RE: [wtp-dev] Regression in Java EE
/ EJB component |
|
I have a fix for 209262 in hand. Petty simple. Should I
release it for a re-spin? Thoughts?
- Konstantin
From: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Raev,
Kaloyan
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 1:12 PM
To:
General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues.
Subject:
[wtp-dev] Regression in Java EE / EJB component
Hello,
I mark the Java EE smoke test as successful, but
there are three issues that are regression from the last I-build:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=209262
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=209264
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=209268
It would be nice if they are fixed during the M3
shutdown period.
Greetings,
Kaloyan Raev
Senior Developer
NW C JS TOOLS JEE
(BG)
SAP
Labs Bulgaria
T +359/2/9157-416
mailto:kaloyan.raev@xxxxxxx
www.sap.com
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments,
may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally
privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named
in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this
message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete
it._______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing
list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.