[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
RE: [vtp-dev] New versions - SCXML?
|
I think it's a great candidate, as it
isn't that big of an incremental cost to add the editing support, and there
is an OSS engine project:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/scxml/
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise Voice Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible."
- Alan Kay
"Michael Greenawalt"
<mgreenawalt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/10/2006 06:28 PM
|
Please respond to
Voice Tools general developers <vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "Voice Tools general developers"
<vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [vtp-dev] New versions - SCXML? |
|
Should we be thinking about
support for SCXML? That is rolling down the pike.
-- Mike
From: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yakulis, Ross
(Ross)
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:31 PM
To: Voice Tools general developers
Subject: RE: [vtp-dev] New versions
Right exactly, same for Avaya
tools you can do either vxml app only or
ccxml and vxml. I was
just curious if any one really uses
the <script> tag in ccxml
and was searching for "real" ccxml
apps.
Thanks,
Ross
-----Original Message-----
From: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Brent D Metz
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:30 PM
To: vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [vtp-dev] New versions
I haven't personally, but it appears to be the W3C's direction for standardizing
call control. From the VTP perspective, it costs us very little resource
to support editing CCXML on top of VoiceXML&SRGSXML so it is at worst
unused functionality by those who don't need/want it. If someone used the
VTP as a base but didn't care for CCXML they could just remove it by taking
away the plugins.
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise Voice Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible."
- Alan Kay
| "Yakulis, Ross \(Ross\)"
<yakulis@xxxxxxxxx>
03/10/2006 03:09 PM
|
|
To
| Brent D Metz/Boca Raton/IBM@IBMUS
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [vtp-dev] New versions |
|
Have you ever seen any "real world" ccxml applications. Everything
I see on the net are just "toy" ccxml applications.
Ross Yakulis (Avaya).
-----Original Message-----
From: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Brent D Metz
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:04 PM
To: Voice Tools general developers
Subject: RE: [vtp-dev] New versions
I'll change the dailies to build and pre-req 1.0.1 to get started.
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise Voice Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible."
- Alan Kay
"Michael Greenawalt"
<mgreenawalt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/10/2006 01:33 PM
|
Please respond to
Voice Tools general developers <vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "Voice Tools general
developers" <vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| RE: [vtp-dev] New versions |
|
No, I have seen no issues with WTP 1.0.1. But I really don’t exercise
much of it.
-- Mike
From: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Brent D Metz
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 7:36 AM
To: Voice Tools general developers
Subject: Re: [vtp-dev] New versions
Since we're 'off plan' at this point I'd like to get more feedback from
those on the list on what would go into a new cycle. I can think of a few
things that could be done ahead of new major features:
- Defect resolution (not many on the books)
- Compatibility with WTP 1.0.1 (So far there hasn't been many problems)
Mike, have you noticed any issues with 1.0.1? I haven't.
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise Voice Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible."
- Alan Kay
"Michael Greenawalt"
<mgreenawalt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/09/2006 09:41 PM
|
Please respond to
Voice Tools general developers <vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
|
To
| "Voice Tools general
developers" <vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
| [vtp-dev] New versions |
|
I have made a couple of changes to the Tellme browser plug-in since the
release candidate was done.
It would be great to have those changes incorporated into the candidate.
One thing I added is a marker on the https requests to Studio so I can
track how much Studio activity we are getting from VTP – don’t know why
I did not think of that sooner.
Also, I suppose it is about time to roll to a new version for the plug-ins,
1.0.1.
-- Mike_______________________________________________
vtp-dev mailing list
vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev_______________________________________________
vtp-dev mailing list
vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev_______________________________________________
vtp-dev mailing list
vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev
