From:
vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Yakulis, Ross (Ross)
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:31
PM
To: Voice
Tools general developers
Subject: RE: [vtp-dev] New
versions
-----Original Message-----
From: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf
Of Brent D Metz
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:30
PM
To: vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [vtp-dev] New
versions
I haven't personally, but it appears to be the W3C's
direction for standardizing call control. From the VTP perspective, it costs us
very little resource to support editing CCXML on top of VoiceXML&SRGSXML so
it is at worst unused functionality by those who don't need/want it. If someone
used the VTP as a base but didn't care for CCXML they could just remove it by
taking away the plugins.
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise Voice
Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be
possible." - Alan Kay
"Yakulis, Ross
\(Ross\)" <yakulis@xxxxxxxxx>
03/10/2006 03:09 PM
|
To
|
Brent D Metz/Boca Raton/IBM@IBMUS
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [vtp-dev] New versions
|
|
Have you ever seen any "real world"
ccxml applications. Everything
I see on the net are just "toy" ccxml
applications.
Ross Yakulis (Avaya).
-----Original
Message-----
From: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Brent D Metz
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 12:04 PM
To: Voice Tools general developers
Subject: RE: [vtp-dev] New versions
I'll change the dailies to build and pre-req 1.0.1 to get started.
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise
Voice Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be
possible." - Alan Kay
"Michael Greenawalt"
<mgreenawalt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/10/2006 01:33 PM
Please
respond to
Voice Tools general developers
<vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
"Voice Tools
general developers" <vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [vtp-dev] New versions
|
|
No, I have seen no issues with WTP 1.0.1. But I really don’t exercise
much of it.
-- Mike
From: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Brent D Metz
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 7:36 AM
To: Voice Tools general developers
Subject: Re: [vtp-dev] New versions
Since we're 'off plan' at this point I'd like to get more feedback from those
on the list on what would go into a new cycle. I can think of a few things that
could be done ahead of new major features:
- Defect resolution (not many on the books)
- Compatibility with WTP 1.0.1 (So far there hasn't been many problems)
Mike, have you noticed any issues with 1.0.1? I haven't.
--
Brent D. Metz
Enterprise
Voice Tools
bdmetz@xxxxxxxxxx
"Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be
possible." - Alan Kay
"Michael Greenawalt"
<mgreenawalt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: vtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
03/09/2006 09:41 PM
Please
respond to
Voice Tools general developers
<vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
To
|
"Voice Tools
general developers" <vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
|
[vtp-dev] New versions
|
|
I have made a couple of changes to the Tellme browser plug-in since the release
candidate was done.
It would be great to have those changes incorporated into the candidate. One
thing I added is a marker on the https requests to Studio so I can track how
much Studio activity we are getting from VTP – don’t know why I did
not think of that sooner.
Also, I suppose it is about time to roll to a new version for the plug-ins,
1.0.1.
-- Mike_______________________________________________
vtp-dev mailing list
vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev_______________________________________________
vtp-dev mailing list
vtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/vtp-dev