[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [virgo-dev] Virgo release branding

On 06/17/2011 11:58 AM, Glyn Normington wrote:
> I am wondering whether we'll need to put the IDE tooling, the bundlor
> manifest generation tool, and each of the samples in their own
> subprojects to give us the necessary versioning and release
> flexibility. It *feels* mostly like make-work, but I guess it would be
> easier to keep the IP logs straight that way. If, OTOH, there is a
> slicker solution, I'm all ears as I have better things to do than
> re-arrange project metadata... ;-)
Like I said, we're set up for projects having a single release stream,
so you may have to be patient with me and help me figure this out. I'd
rather avoid make-work as well. I'd only recommend making a separate
project if it makes sense for your committer base and community. At this
point, I don't believe that this is the case. This may change with time.

Had the PMC weighed in on this? They may have an opinion about the split
between runtimes and tools.