[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [technology-pmc] Request assistance on CQ 22578 (topbraid shacl works-with dependency
|
Hi Jeen,
I'm unsure if those updates a distributed widely on a mailing list (push model). I'll raise it with EMO.
The usual place I recommend following reading is Wayne's blog
https://blogs.eclipse.org/blogs/wayne-beaton
-Gunnar
--
Gunnar Wagenknecht
gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/
> On Dec 8, 2020, at 08:29, Jeen Broekstra <jeen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, at 17:18, Jeen Broekstra wrote:
>> Thanks Gunnar,
>>
>> Regarding ClearlyDefined: I did not, I wasn't aware of this tool or that we had adopted this. Looks like I missed a couple of updates.
>>
>> Stupid question perhaps but how do I "run the IP tool"? There doesn't seem to be any new option to that effect in the project portal.
>
> Never mind, found the relevant entry in the handbook:
>
> https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#ip-license-tool
>
> At the risk of going slightly off-topic: is there a mailinglist or forum on which these kinds of changes are normally announced, that I'm somehow missing out on? Because this is not the first time I've been caught out by changes in the diligence process (it's perfectly possible that I'm already on it and just missed the memo).
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Jeen
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
